Sell Ltd
Cluster 2 · Comparison · Updated 1 January 1970

CVA vs administration — which route fits your company?

Both processes are designed to save value in a distressed UK company — but they work very differently. A CVA is a long compromise with unsecured creditors, run by the directors. Administration is a short, controlled process run by an outsider under legal protection. The right choice depends on time pressure, creditor mix and whether the business can honestly afford a plan.

TL;DR — 30-second answer
Choose a CVA when the business is viable, debt is manageable over 3–5 years, and there is no imminent enforcement threat. Choose administration when a moratorium is needed now, when a going-concern sale is the plan, or when directors have run out of runway. Both processes require a licensed insolvency practitioner and both are public.

Side-by-side

DimensionCVAAdministration
Who is in controlDirectors, monitored by a SupervisorAdministrator — directors lose all powers
MoratoriumNo automatic moratorium (a separate CIGA one can be layered on)Automatic on appointment, freezing enforcement
CostLower — Nominee fee + 8–12% Supervisor fee on realisationsHigher — sale-process fees, trading costs, detailed reporting
Speed to protectWeeks — proposal, notice period, creditor voteDays — appointment triggers moratorium immediately
Vote required75% by value + 50% unconnectedNo vote — court or QFCH or director appointment
Binds secured creditors?No, unless they consentYes, temporarily, via the moratorium
Binds preferential creditors?No, unless they consent (HMRC almost never does)Order of distribution respected in outcome
Typical duration3–5 years of payments3–12 months of process
Best when…Business is viable, debt is manageable if stretchedEnforcement is imminent, or a sale is needed
Failure exitNotice of Failure — often leads to administrationMove to CVL or dissolution

A director's decision flow

Is there a winding-up petition or imminent enforcement? → Administration (moratorium wins).
Is a specific buyer already circling? → Administration (pre-pack or accelerated M&A).
Is the business profitable at the operating line, ignoring legacy debt? → CVA is on the table.
Is HMRC the largest creditor? → CVA is hard — HMRC's preferential claim sits outside it.
Are landlords the largest creditor? → CVAs have a strong record here (retail, hospitality).
Can the company reliably pay CVA instalments for 3–5 years? → If not, don't propose one — it fails and burns credibility.

Read next

Frequently asked questions

Can I do both — a CVA inside an administration?

Yes. An administrator can propose a CVA as the exit route from administration. This combines the moratorium and control of administration with the long-term compromise of a CVA.

Which is cheaper — CVA or administration?

A CVA. It has no trading period run by an outsider, no sale process, and lower ongoing fees. But it only works if the business can afford the CVA payments on time.

Which returns more to creditors?

Depends on the business. A CVA usually returns more when the company can trade profitably going forward. Administration usually returns more when going-concern goodwill would be lost without an immediate moratorium.

Do directors get replaced in either?

In a CVA, no — directors stay in place, subject to Supervisor oversight. In administration, yes — the administrator takes over and directors' powers are suspended.

What if HMRC won't compromise?

HMRC's preferential VAT/PAYE/NIC claim (from December 2020) is outside any CVA unless HMRC votes in favour. If HMRC will not accept the deal, a CVA typically cannot fund the required payment — administration or liquidation becomes the realistic route.

Which is more public?

Both are public — filed at Companies House. Administration is filed daily and often reported in trade press; a CVA is filed and appears in The Gazette but is usually lower profile unless it's a large retailer.